Chapter Contents 
Previous 
Next 
The REG Procedure 
The value of d is close to 2 if the errors are uncorrelated. The distribution of d is reported by Durbin and Watson (1951). Tables of the distribution are found in most econometrics textbooks, such as Johnston (1972) and Pindyck and Rubinfeld (1981).
The sample autocorrelation estimate is displayed after the DurbinWatson statistic. The sample is computed as
This autocorrelation of the residuals may not be a very good estimate of the autocorrelation of the true errors, especially if there are few observations and the independent variables have certain patterns. If there are missing observations in the regression, these measures are computed as though the missing observations did not exist.
Positive autocorrelation of the errors generally tends to make the estimate of the error variance too small, so confidence intervals are too narrow and true null hypotheses are rejected with a higher probability than the stated significance level. Negative autocorrelation of the errors generally tends to make the estimate of the error variance too large, so confidence intervals are too wide and the power of significance tests is reduced. With either positive or negative autocorrelation, leastsquares parameter estimates are usually not as efficient as generalized leastsquares parameter estimates. For more details, refer to Judge et al. (1985, Chapter 8) and the SAS/ETS User's Guide, Version 7.
The following SAS statements request the DW option for the US population data (see Figure 50.56):
proc reg data=USPopulation; model Population=Year YearSq / dw; run;

Chapter Contents 
Previous 
Next 
Top 
Copyright © 1999 by SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. All rights reserved.