|
Chapter Contents |
Previous |
Next |
| Language Reference |
nonlinear optimization by Nelder-Mead simplex method
See "Nonlinear Optimization and Related Subroutines" for a listing of all NLP subroutines. See "Nonlinear Optimization Examples" for a description of the inputs to and outputs of all NLP subroutines.
The Nelder-Mead simplex method is one of the subroutines that can solve optimization problems with nonlinear constraints. It does not use any derivatives, and it does not assume that the objective function has continuous derivatives. However, the objective function must be continuous. The NLPNMS technique uses a large number of function calls, and it may be unable to generate precise results when n>40.
The NLPNMS subroutine uses the following simplex algorithms:
The original Nelder-Mead algorithm cannot be used for general linear or nonlinear constraints, but in the unconstrained or boundary-constrained cases, it can be faster. It changes the shape of the simplex by adapting the nonlinearities of the objective function; this contributes to an increased speed of convergence.
Powell's COBYLA algorithm is a sequential
trust-region algorithm that tries to maintain a
regularly-shaped simplex throughout the iterations.
The algorithm uses a monotone-decreasing
radius,
, of a spheric trust region.
The modification implemented in the NLPNMS call permits an
increase of the trust-region radius
in special situations.
A sequence of iterations is performed with a constant
trust-region radius
until the computed function
reduction is much less than the predicted reduction.
Then, the trust-region radius
is reduced.
The trust-region radius is increased only if the
computed function reduction is relatively close to the
predicted reduction and if the simplex is well-shaped.
The start radius,
, can be specified
with the second element of the par argument,
and the final radius,
, can be specified
with the ninth element of the tc argument.
Convergence to small values of
, or high-precision
convergence, may require many calls of the function and
constraint modules and may result in numerical problems.
The main reasons for the slow convergence
of the COBYLA algorithm are as follows:
For more information on the special sets of termination criteria used by the NLPNMS algorithms, see "Termination Criteria"
In addition to the standard iteration history, the NLPNMS subroutine prints the following information. For unconstrained or boundary-constrained problems, the subroutine also prints
The following code uses the NLPNMS call to solve the Rosen-Suzuki problem (see "Rosen-Suzuki Problem" ), which has three nonlinear constraints:
proc iml;
start F_HS43(x);
f = x*x` + x[3]*x[3] - 5*(x[1] + x[2]) - 21*x[3] + 7*x[4];
return(f);
finish F_HS43;
start C_HS43(x);
c = j(3,1,0.);
c[1] = 8 - x*x` - x[1] + x[2] - x[3] + x[4];
c[2] = 10 - x*x` - x[2]*x[2] - x[4]*x[4] + x[1] + x[4];
c[3] = 5 - 2.*x[1]*x[1] - x[2]*x[2] - x[3]*x[3]
- 2.*x[1] + x[2] + x[4];
return(c);
finish C_HS43;
x = j(1,4,1);
optn= j(1,11,.); optn[2]= 3; optn[10]= 3; optn[11]=0;
call nlpnms(rc,xres,"F_HS43",x,optn,,,,,"C_HS43");
Part of the output produced by the preceding code is shown in Figure 17.6.
Optimization Start
Parameter Estimates
N Parameter Estimate
1 X1 1.000000
2 X2 1.000000
3 X3 1.000000
4 X4 1.000000
Value of Objective Function = -19
Values of Nonlinear Constraints
Constraint Residual
[ 1 ] 4.0000
[ 2 ] 6.0000
[ 3 ] 1.0000
Nelder-Mead Simplex Optimization
COBYLA Algorithm by M.J.D. Powell (1992)
Minimum Iterations 0
Maximum Iterations 1000
Maximum Function Calls 3000
Iterations Reducing Constraint Violation 0
ABSFCONV Function Criterion 0
FCONV Function Criterion 2.220446E-16
FCONV2 Function Criterion 1E-6
FSIZE Parameter 0
ABSXCONV Parameter Change Criterion 0.0001
XCONV Parameter Change Criterion 0
XSIZE Parameter 0
ABSCONV Function Criterion -1.34078E154
Initial Simplex Size (INSTEP) 0.5
Singularity Tolerance (SINGULAR) 1E-8
Nelder-Mead Simplex Optimization
COBYLA Algorithm by M.J.D. Powell (1992)
Parameter Estimates 4
Nonlinear Constraints 3
Optimization Start
Objective Function -29.5 Maximum Constraint Violation 4.5
Maximum
Function Objective Constraint
Iter Restarts Calls Function Violation
1 0 12 -52.80342 4.3411
2 0 17 -39.51475 0.0227
3 0 53 -44.02098 0.00949
4 0 62 -44.00214 0.000833
5 0 72 -44.00009 0.000033
6 0 79 -44.00000 1.783E-6
7 0 90 -44.00000 1.363E-7
8 0 94 -44.00000 1.543E-8
Between
Actual
Merit and
Merit Function Predicted
Iter Function Change Change
1 -42.3031 12.803 1.000
2 -39.3797 -2.923 0.250
3 -43.9727 4.593 0.0625
4 -43.9977 0.0249 0.0156
5 -43.9999 0.00226 0.0039
6 -44.0000 0.00007 0.0010
7 -44.0000 1.74E-6 0.0002
8 -44.0000 5.33E-7 0.0001
Optimization Results
Iterations 8 Function Calls 95
Restarts 0 Objective Function -44.00000003
Maximum Constraint Violation 1.543059E-8 Merit Function -43.99999999
Actual Over Pred Change 0.0001
ABSXCONV convergence criterion satisfied.
WARNING: The point x is feasible only at the LCEPSILON= 1E-7 range.
Optimization Results
Parameter Estimates
N Parameter Estimate
1 X1 -0.000034167
2 X2 1.000004
3 X3 2.000023
4 X4 -0.999971
Value of Objective Function = -44.00000003
Values of Nonlinear Constraints
Constraint Residual
[ 1 ] -1.54E-8 *?*
[ 2 ] 1.0000
[ 3 ] -1.5E-8 *?*
Figure 17.6: Iteration History for the NLPNMS Subroutine
|
Chapter Contents |
Previous |
Next |
Top |
Copyright © 1999 by SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. All rights reserved.