Columnist
WASHINGTON --
Georgetown University student David J. Wong, who is
editor in chief of a campus newspaper called The Hoya,
has a very bright future in newspaper journalism.
This week, Wong
exhibited all the finest and most familiar traits of
the liberal media we've come to know and loathe:
allegiance to ideological groupthink, aversion to
controversy, deference to establishment bullies and
willingness to censor well-informed opinions that
challenge politically correct sacred cows.
On Monday, Wong
fired a conservative student columnist, Georgetown
junior Robert Swope, because he didn't like the
writer's strong views on feminist hypocrisy and
politicized scholarship in the Women's Studies
Department.
Swope became a
biweekly columnist for The Hoya to get readers "to
think and debate liberal and post-modern orthodoxies
that they just accept as truth."
His column was
called "Sed Contra" -- Latin for "But
Against." Alas, Swope performed his job as lone
campus media contrarian too well for his own good.
Not a single staff member of The Hoya, faculty member
or administrator has publicly protested his firing,
Swope told me.
In one recently
published article for The Hoya, Swope opined that
"women's studies programs have gained a foothold,
while weak-willed and half-educated college
administrators cowardly hide in their offices, afraid
of cutting the budgets of the most intellectually
bankrupt academic fraud ever to hit the American
academy."
Swope reported
on the political activities of Georgetown's Women's
Studies Department, including the publication of a
newsletter that promoted pro-abortion fund raising
and advertised job opportunities at the radical
Feminist Majority Foundation and in Hillary Clinton's
campaign for U.S. Senate.
"This isn't
an exercise in intellectual activity; it's left-wing
political advocacy funded by an institution that isn't
even supposed to be in the business of politics,"
Swope noted.
Feminist
students and scholars, naturally, balked and squawked.
Swope's latest
submission, which led to his firing, criticized a
recent local production on campus of an infamous,
sexually-charged play by feminist Eve Ensler titled
"The Vagina Monologues." Was Swope guilty
of sloppy reporting? Unethical behavior? Bad writing?
No. He simply
reported on one of the play's most offensive scenes
-- the seduction and statutory rape of a 13-year-old
girl by a 24-year-old lesbian -- and questioned
Georgetown's official sponsorship of such illegal and
immoral tripe.
In the
unpublished column, headlined "Applause for Rape
at Georgetown," Swope described the campus
reaction to the play: "Like clap-ridden sailors
in a Southeast Asian strip joint, the mostly female
audience who attended the monologues hooted and
hollered, laughing and clapping at just about every
piece presented" -- including that statutory
rape scene, in which the older woman plied the young
girl with vodka and orange juice before molesting her.
"(W)hy is
rape only wrong when a man commits it," Swope
wondered, "but when it's by a woman committed
against another woman, who just happens to be 13
years old, it is celebrated and a university club
sponsors it?" Swope called on the university to
stop funding campus organizations involved in the
play's production.
Strong stuff.
Provocative stuff. Exactly the kind of writing that
belongs on a student newspaper's opinion page -- or
any opinion page -- dedicated to free expression,
free thought and a free market of competing ideas.
Yet, in an e-mail, The Hoya's Wong told Swope that
the paper dropped his sharply reasoned columns
because they were not "constructive" and
that "all you do is criticize." (Wong did
not return my call seeking comment.)
Wong's
instincts -- to panic, cower and pander in the face
of heated criticism from left-wing interest groups --
will serve him well in the mainstream media. Swope,
for his part, is undaunted and is trying to get his
job back. "It is a shame that a student could be
censored and removed like this because of his
conservative views at an institution where diversity
of ideas and freedom of speech are regularly
trumpeted as ideals by which to live," Swope
told me.
Get used to it,
kid. Sadly, the Wongs of the world inherit the Fourth
Estate.