
General
Information | Symposium Agenda | Registration
| Applications | Accommodations
| Contact Us
Paper
Presentation Checklist
The research paper
should describe original research results.
Applicants wishing to present a paper at OKN-JSHS should use this checklist:
1. ABSTRACT
Six copies of the
175-word abstract must be submitted, with application form, typed on the
JSHS Abstract Form.
2. RESEACH PAPER
Six copies of the
typed final research paper (maximum of twenty pages in length) will
be submitted with the application by March 11, 200, and will be used
during the judging process.
Suggested outline
includes:
3. ORAL PRESENTATION
Length of presentation
is fifteen minutes with five additional minutes for questions. This time
limit will be strictly monitored. Audiovisual equipment available includes:
- 35mm slide projector
with remote control
- Overhead projector
- Remote pointer
- Microphone
- Powerpoint 97 for
IBM
- LCD Projector (note:
highest resolution is 800 x 600)
- VCR and television
There are limitations on the use of computers and projection panels.
Contact one of the directors for more detailed information prior to
the symposium.
4. JUDGING
The JSHS judging team
includes individuals who hold either a Ph.D. or equivalent experience
in the following general fields of research that are represented by the
student presenters. Judges are selected also for their interest in encouraging
the students' interests and future development in the sciences, engineering,
or mathematics. The judges review the student papers and presentations
as follows:
- All of the written
reports (e.g., abstract and paper) are read. The paper is used as supporting
documentation during the judging process.
- The oral presentations
are evaluated by each member of the assigned session judging team.
- The questioning
period that follows the oral presentations aids judges in clarifying
the students depth of understanding, the amount of work and level of
effort, and the individual contributions to the research problem.
- Following the sessions,
the individual session judging teams meet and deliberate to select finalists
from each session.
ALL JUDGES' DECISIONS
ARE FINAL
Judging criteria:
The following criteria are used to judge the research presentations.
- Quality of the
research and experimentation as evidenced by clarity in stating
the problem; identification of the important variables; originality
and ingenuity in the research design or apparatus; selection of proper
equipment for the research task; recognition of the limitations in the
accuracy and significance of the results obtained; and limitations of
conclusions drawn to those that are clearly supported by the results.
- Evidence of
students' understanding of the scientific and tecinical principles
involved in the investigation.
- Originality
in the choice and investigation of the topic.
- Acknowledgment
of major assistance. The student speaker must acknowledge any direct
assistance received. As a researcher, the student is neither rewarded
or penalized by the judges for utilizing special advisors or equipment.
Examples of areas of assistance that should be acknowledged include
selecting the topic of research; gathering data; and constructing apparatus.
- The quality
of oral and written presentations as evidenced by the organization
of the paper; use of audiovisuals; clarity of enunciation; use of acceptable
terms and grammar; voice projection; definition of terms when necessary;
and capacity to handle questions. The presentation is important in the
evaluation of the student, but content, not form, will be given the
major weight.
|